China trademarks on a startup budget
A small team often has to choose between broader coverage now and staged spending. Staging can be one budgeting option, but every unfiled class remains unprotected and the right sequence depends on the real goods, services, and exposure.
On this page
Early beats affordable, especially before a raise or a launch
China is generally first-to-file, so the earlier application usually has the stronger position, and how the first-to-file system works covers why that decides ownership. Two reasons make it sharper for a startup. A trademark already on file can be one less open item in IP diligence when you raise. And the window of exposure opens before launch, not after: if you manufacture in China or pitch the brand in public, the name is out before the first sale. For anyone making goods in China, filing before your first production run is the same argument at the source.
Treat staged classes as an explicit tradeoff
A China application is priced by class, so a small team can compare the cost of filing now with the exposure left by postponing a class. No business needs all 45 classes by default, but no first filing reserves the same mark in classes it does not cover.
One way to evaluate a staged budget:
- Core class first. Identify the class covering the product or service that creates the immediate business risk.
- Then the classes you sell through. Decide whether sales-channel services create a separate current need rather than assuming they can always wait.
- Stage the rest. Later filings can follow as the business becomes real, but the first filing does not reserve the same mark in unfiled classes. Record that exposure instead of treating staged filing as complete coverage.
Each class is its own USD 150, so the number of classes is the one lever you control. Before you commit, check which class your product needs so the first dollars land on the right marks, and see what the $150 per class covers for the full price picture.
A flat fee, and a direct filing route
The price stays out of your way. A China trademark with Ginbing is USD 150 per class, the CNIPA government filing fee included, with up to 10 items per class and USD 10 for each item beyond that. It costs the same for a two-person startup as for a large brand, because it scales by class, not by company size.
Ginbing’s service uses its own recorded Chinese agency. The legal agency requirement applies to foreign persons without habitual residence in China and foreign enterprises without a place of business in China. Whether foreign applicants need a local agent explains the rule.
When the budget and the timing line up, the filing itself is straightforward. Start a China trademark filing at USD 150 per class, and read how filing works for the steps from intake to receipt.
Read the durable filing references in Docs, or contact [email protected].